一安全气囊点火器的生产商用wavebook检测点火器的响应时间和触发装置。
In contrast to other automotive safety features such as seat belts, which can be periodically checked for proper operating condition, in-vehicle airbags may be stored unchecked for years before being used. Because lives depend upon airbag systems being ready to deploy in an instant, rigorous airbag testing is critical.
Application Summary
One of the most important components of an airbag system is the ignitor, which generates the explosion that forces the airbag out of its storage compartment when a specific amount of force is applied to a vehicle. This simple device must operate flawlessly. If the triggering mechanism detects the force improperly, the airbag can falsely deploy or fail to deploy; if the trigger is late in responding, the airbag fails to prevent potential injury. A leading manufacturer of airbag ignitors ensures that its ignitors work properly by having research engineers examine the ignitor’s response time and trigger detection mechanism during the unit’s design and test phase.
Until recently, the engineers subjected ignitor designs only to laboratory tests, which they measured with a digital storage oscilloscope (DSO). For most of these tests, the engineers connected a DSO to a desktop PC via its RS-232 port so that they could store, analyze, and report their data in a third-party data acquisition software package running on the PC. For tests that required multiple data channels, the engineers found that the DSO had limited memory depth and input channels. To circumvent the input-channel limitation, the engineers linked multiple DSOs together. Besides being a costly and awkward solution, the daisy-chained DSOs could not provide simultaneous triggering. Furthermore, the engineers had difficulty correlating the data acquired from the DSOs.
Potential Solutions
The engineers evaluated two PC-based data acquisition solutions. They first considered a rack-mounted system. Although the engineers considered this solution preferable to daisy-chaining DSOs, they eventually decided against it because it was not sufficiently portable for in-vehicle testing. The second solution was a 1-MHz A/D plug-in board, which the engineers planned to install in an industrial-grade, rugged “luggable” PC. However, this option was still too large and heavy for their requirements.
